Trigger words: best
Indicator sentences: Then you have to define best.
Negotiation parts: To me, we've yet to see the best interpretation of LOTR. Some people like the theatrical cut, some like the extended cut. The best version would be universally considered as such. That neither of these cuts are universally considered the best LOTR interpretation is indicative of the fact that neither are as good as they could be. I didn't say the theatrical cuts are the best, I just said they're better. There's no such thing as a perfect movie. It's probably worth pointing out the Return of the King won Best Picture for it's theatrical cut though. [STA-CITE]> I'm more interested in LOTR being the best movies they could possibly be [END-CITE]Who gave it Best Picture? The Academy. Best Picture doesn't mean it was the best possible adaptation of Tolkien's work... it means it was better than all the other pictures that year. I understand. Your claim is that the theatrical cuts of Jackson's interpretation of Tolkein's Lord of The Rings series are the definitive, and therefore best, film adaption of the source. That's not the case since the best version would be considered as such by everyone. That is not how 'best' works. So something can only be considered better than something else if the opinion is unanimous?
Trigger words: best
Indicator sentences: That is not how 'best' works.
Trigger words: best
Indicator sentences: So something can only be considered better than something else if the opinion is unanimous?