Dialogue ID: t3_2rcpqy

Corpus: Winning Arguments (ChangeMyView) Corpus

URL: https://convokit.cornell.edu/documentation/winning.html

License:

WMN sequences (1):

WMN ID: t3_2rcpqy_t1_cneniy0

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: WMN: non-understanding

WMN Meaning: both

Trigger words: chicken egg (2)

Indicator sentences: It depends on how you define chicken egg.

Negotiation parts: Is a chicken egg an egg that will hatch into a chicken? Or is it an egg that was laid by a chicken? The answer to this question determines which came first. A chicken egg is an egg that will hatch into a chicken, independent of its parents. If a horse and donkey mate, they will have a mule, not a "horse offspring". Good analogy. I was trying to think of one. So what do you call the egg laid after two proto-chickens of the same species mate? If there isn't a chicken baby, then an X-egg. If you're trying to make the point that GWhizzz made [over here](http://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2rcpqy/cmv_the_egg_came_first_before_the_chicken/cnersdk) I think that's a good point that changes my view from "It's clear once you make a semantic choice" to "you can make the semantics go so deep that it stops even being fun, and that's saying something."