Trigger words: wikis (3) wiki (3)
Indicator sentences: Your claim as to what wikis are is incorrect about the very first wiki ever.
Negotiation parts: The original WikiWikiWeb site was the Portland Patterns Repository, an extremely specialist site about software design patterns, started in 1995 (six years before Wikipedia). And it isn't even a specialist *encyclopedia* - it includes *a couple of decades' worth* of long, rambling discussions on these and related topics. As for the definition of a wiki, I would argue that my definition is relatively accurate for *today*. I am relatively young and did not see the early days of the Internet, so my perspective is mostly from the modern era of the total dominance and mostly-trustworthiness of WP.
Trigger words: skeptic (2) skeptics
Indicator sentences: Questioning accepted truths is exactly what it means to be a skeptic. How can you praise it in one paragraph but insult it in another?
Negotiation parts: Skepticism doesn't mean questioning or disbelief, it means suspending belief until a certain burden of proof is met. I described RationalWiki as anti-informational, but not for being skeptical or testing, but for self-praise, naive realism, and fundamentally not "believing" on understanding the information, but on following pop culture and modern science without actually understanding it, and claiming to understand it. The ignorance of modern "skepticism" is thinly veiled.