Dialogue ID: t3_2v0u7q

Corpus: Winning Arguments (ChangeMyView) Corpus

URL: https://convokit.cornell.edu/documentation/winning.html

License:

WMN sequences (2):

WMN ID: t3_2v0u7q_t1_codi74z

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: WMN: non-understanding

WMN Meaning: both

Trigger words: hypocrite

Indicator sentences: Do you mean there's no hypocrasy within the argument the smoker is making itself? Or that the smoker themselves aren't hypocritical?

Negotiation parts: Both I guess, not practising a policy/behaviour/whatever that you claim is good/argue for is not hypocrasy. A hypocrite would be someone who smokes denouncing smoking saying "any health conscious person like myself knows the risks of smoking and so does not". Hypocrisy involves lying, not just a failure to "practice what one preaches". Although that is just a technical definition that does not really match how it is often used so I probably am just being pedantic. hmm, ya so like 'liberal' or 'good' or 'life' words can apply to different definitions, essentially they might as well have totally different spellings but since that luxury isn't avail, I'll clarify that the 'hypocracy' im applying here is like the examples in the post text, so my take wouldn't encompass the definition of hypocracy to which lying is a necessary component.

WMN ID: t3_2v0u7q_t1_codowga

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: Other kinds of clarification requests

WMN Meaning: no WMN

Indicator sentences: By this do you mean, it's informative to the voters of the true motives behind a policy-position change, or the like?