Dialogue ID: t3_2xcu0u

Corpus: Winning Arguments (ChangeMyView) Corpus

URL: https://convokit.cornell.edu/documentation/winning.html

License:

WMN sequences (1):

WMN ID: t3_2xcu0u_t1_coyyw2v

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: WMN: disagreement

WMN Meaning: situated meaning

Trigger words: Terrorism (2) terrorism (5)

Indicator sentences: Unless you're restricting your definition of terrorism here to hacktivism like website defacement, property damage, or stealing e-mails, you're essentially calling for attacks on employees of corporations.

Negotiation parts: I must politely disagree that anti-corporate terrorism inherently targets humans. One can easily target corporate assets without hurting anyone (physically). For example, destroying a local HSBC branch without anyone inside (kind of like Fight Club, but, you know, plausible; I hope that reference doesn't damage my credibility). Granted, it can cost jobs to locals and hurt families financially, potentially, among other things (it would be a negligible loss to HSBC anyways and would be make for a poor target). Alternatively, one can destroy an integral power supply or hijack a delivery truck or any number of things which would hurt the corporation in question once or in a drawn out conflict of attrition. Desensitization campaigns, such as repeatedly placing a empty box or bag outside of Facebook (e.g.) headquarters would damage output at no cost to civilian lives.