Dialogue ID: t3_33ky08

Corpus: Winning Arguments (ChangeMyView) Corpus

URL: https://convokit.cornell.edu/documentation/winning.html

License:

WMN sequences (2):

WMN ID: t3_33ky08_t1_cqmltib

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: WMN: disagreement

WMN Meaning: potential meaning

Trigger words: socialist

Indicator sentences: You are narrowing the definition of socialism here, non of this was in your origInal proposition that all wealth transfer is socialism.

Negotiation parts: I think you have this silly yet very common belief that socialism and capitalism are two opposite things. Capitalism and socialism are not mutually exclusive. In fact, every *communist* state utilizes capitalist markets (albeit heavily regulated ones), so you can't even really say that even communism and capitalism are mutually exclusive, and communism is a far more extreme expression of collectivist policy than socialism is. I think you have a very silly belief that socialism is types of wealth transfer. Socialism refers to actual, physical control of means of production (factories/land). Taxing business is not socialism. Then explain the socialist governments of Europe. Why is Denmark considered socialist, when its government does not own all the means of production? Answer: The government taxes approximately 48% of its total GDP (2009), and uses that money for programs like welfare, public healthcare, and unemployment nets.

WMN ID: t3_33ky08_t1_cqms6pg

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: Non-pursued

WMN Meaning: no WMN

Trigger words: socialism (2) Socialism

Indicator sentences: your definition of socialism is wrong;