Dialogue ID: t3_3abaqq

Corpus: Winning Arguments (ChangeMyView) Corpus

URL: https://convokit.cornell.edu/documentation/winning.html

License:

WMN sequences (3):

WMN ID: t3_3abaqq_t1_csb38zu--TIO1

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: Non-pursued

WMN Meaning: no WMN

Trigger words: Gender gender (8) genders

Indicator sentences: Gender is a physical thing.

Negotiation parts: People tend to say things like sex is what is in your pants, and gender is what's in your head. Or that gender is just a social construct (it turns out that sex is also a social construct, but it's a bit complicated, and not part of this post).

WMN ID: t3_3abaqq_t1_csb38zu--TIO2

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: Non-pursued

WMN Meaning: no WMN

Trigger words: androgyny

Indicator sentences: Androgyny is based on appearance, and not identity.

WMN ID: t3_3abaqq_t1_csblpld

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: WMN: disagreement

WMN Meaning: situated meaning

Trigger words: Sex

Indicator sentences: It's not the act of sex we're talking about. We're talking about the existence of sexes. Aka penis and vagina.

Negotiation parts: I know. I was just trying to be funny, because what you wrote invites the transitive property. You wrote: If sex is a social construct, then social construct is meaningless. Then by the transitive property, you think sex is meaningless. Now even if you meant penises and vaginas, you still didn't say why you think they're meaningless.