Dialogue ID: t3_3c4ur8

Corpus: Winning Arguments (ChangeMyView) Corpus

URL: https://convokit.cornell.edu/documentation/winning.html

License:

WMN sequences (3):

WMN ID: t3_3c4ur8_t1_csse6wq

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: Other kinds of clarification requests

WMN Meaning: no WMN

Indicator sentences: The rest of your response does not make sense to me. Please elaborate your 'math' example.

WMN ID: t3_3c4ur8_t1_cssmobs

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: WMN: disagreement

WMN Meaning: both

Trigger words: respect (2)

Indicator sentences: That’s not the only definition of respect.

Negotiation parts: When a soldier jumps on a grenade and is blown apart to protect his friends, it is unlikely that he was using rational ability and using well-thought decisions. He was acting on instinct but we still respect him for that decision. To the point about my definition of respect: I know that there are many ways you can define it, but in this specific post, that is how I am defining it for this conversation. I think it is a bit of a stretch to compare a parent's concern to jumping on a grenade, but I see your point.

WMN ID: t3_3c4ur8_t1_csstz3k

Context: Online interaction

WMN Type: WMN: non-understanding

WMN Meaning: situated meaning

Trigger words: children child (4)

Indicator sentences: It would greatly help if you clarified whether or not you mean adult children or child children.

Negotiation parts: ∆ I meant for the conversation to be about children who are able to have a logical conversation, so probably somewhere around high school age unless you have a very intelligent child. Sorry I was not more clear in the original post.