Label

Type: Indicator

Excerpt: the term "marriage" is never used synonymously with "love;" there is always an implication that there will be rights and responsibilities granted to the couple by some larger organization, be it their church community, social network, or the government. it sounds like you're defining "marriage" as being what americans would consider a "long-term relationship," which is something decided by only those two people, and can be broken without any external ramifications. if that's what the word means in australia, then i agree that it would be silly for there to need to be a huge debate about whether homosexuals can date indefinitely.

Found in dialogues:

Found in WMN sequences: