Trigger words: waffles (10) waffle (2)
Indicator sentences: Well which definition are we supposed to go by according to your view? The dictionary definition mentions nothing about waffles being fluffy on the inside or being at least double the height of a pancake, yet your definition mentions bother of these things. So, which definition of a waffle should we be going by?
Negotiation parts: Let us look at the Merriam-Webster waffle definition. 1waf·fle \ˈwä-fəl, ˈwȯ-\ noun :a crisp cake of batter baked in a waffle iron [STA-CITE]> True waffles are crisp on the outside and fluffy on the inside, and at least double the height of a pancake. [END-CITE] True, the pancake height was my own personal addition for dramatic effect, but that doesn't take away from the fact that Waffle House waffles are not crisp, and therefore do not fit the definition. Your personal opinion has no affect on a business though. They serve what meets the dictionary (and therefore societal) definition of a waffle. So should I go by the dictionary definition of a waffle or your personal definition? If crispness is the sole determining factor then it seems like Waffle House may simply undercook their waffles, not that they aren't waffles at all.
Trigger words: waffles (10) waffle (2)
Indicator sentences: So the definition of waffle changes based on how long you cook it? I happen to enjoy my waffles slightly undercooked, does that mean that they are not waffles?
Trigger words: waffles (10) waffle (2)
Indicator sentences: Why do you limit your waffle type to only Belgian style? That is very snobbish and just wrong. Also they do meet the dictionary definition. Why do you ignore your own definition?